Journals Information
Universal Journal of Management Vol. 6(8), pp. 287 - 294
DOI: 10.13189/ujm.2018.060804
Reprint (PDF) (1661Kb)
Alternatives of Work with Risks Used at Technological Facilities Safety Management
D. Prochazkova *, J. Prochazka
Faculty of Transportation Sciences, Czech Technical University, Prague, Czech Republic
ABSTRACT
The aim of all people is human security and development. Therefore, they need technological facilities, which ensure energy, services and products for life. Present cognition shows that safety of technological facilities is based on copping with risks. Human cognition contains a lot of knowledge and experiences with risks, but in reality only part of them are used in practice. The aim of research, the results of which are presented, was the judgment, how in practice connected with complex technological facility safety it is used the present human cognition on work with risks. With regard to world dynamic development it is necessary the priority risks to monitor and to cope with them during time, and also to measure the respective safety. At measure of rate for safety level we use the known experience that the better coping with relevant risks, the higher facility safety level is. The analysis of based publications and data from real practice shows that seven domains at work with risks are important. The paper shows the results of critical judgment of individual techniques that are used at work with risks in technological facilities in practice.
KEYWORDS
Safety Culture, Systems of Systems, Technological Facility, Work with Risks
Cite This Paper in IEEE or APA Citation Styles
(a). IEEE Format:
[1] D. Prochazkova , J. Prochazka , "Alternatives of Work with Risks Used at Technological Facilities Safety Management," Universal Journal of Management, Vol. 6, No. 8, pp. 287 - 294, 2018. DOI: 10.13189/ujm.2018.060804.
(b). APA Format:
D. Prochazkova , J. Prochazka (2018). Alternatives of Work with Risks Used at Technological Facilities Safety Management. Universal Journal of Management, 6(8), 287 - 294. DOI: 10.13189/ujm.2018.060804.